Labels

Saturday 27 September 2014

DO WE REALLY NEED THE GOLDEN GOOSE???

Once upon a time, in a kingdom not far away, there lived a King who ruled over a glorious nation endowed with fertile land, dormant yet adroit population, natural and mineral wealth. Well, literally and officially he was the nominal King under an authoritarian General. He was quiet an ordinary man, like any other men in the Kingdom but he had connections and having right connections in that Kingdom was key to power. However, as a result of wide-spread corruption, lethargic administration and a stoical population whose endurance was on verge of extinction the great General and his poker king were dethroned with heavy steps.
In state of privation for an able ruler and blossoming destitution, a meeting was held by wise men of the kingdom and courtier. They unanimously voted for a nobleman considered to have rhetoric personality and skills of a competent ruler to take over the reins of Kingdom. His coronation ceremony was elaborately celebrated and religiously attended by the populace. Entire kingdom was teeming with conviction of change. During his days as Nobleman, he had heard of a Kingdom far far away where lands were barren but was rich in a special class of birds known as golden goose. After taking over as the King, he decided to pay a visit to the king of Kingdom far far away and enter a settlement to fetch that golden chick. A day before his journey, an old wise man of the Kingdom forcibly entered precinct of the palace and warned him, “Golden Goose will bring no good to this kingdom”. But King and his men took him as a frantic & he was shown the door. Next day, King embarked on his journey and reached the kingdom far far away. Being impressed by his charismatic personality and passion to take his nation forward, King of far far away gifted him a golden geese and even promised to facilitate trade between them. The golden goose was given a special treatment and a royal place was allocated for her laying eggs. Even a committee was appointed to study and devise ways to increase her productivity. But no matter whatever was done, she used to lay just one golden egg in a day. Slowly, on one hand richness started making inroads, trade started booming, new technology offers started pouring in and wealth was getting accumulated but still happiness was nowhere in sight. Rich were getting richer but poor were getting still poorer, death was sniffing around various corners, people were still getting into religious and regional clashes, orthodox and evil practices were on rise and agriculture was dying a slow death. And one not so fine day, one of the advisors to King told him that golden goose was killed by impatient people in hope of getting rich, no of course not, it’s not the same fable. Instead he informed that the goose has stopped laying egg.

..............................................

The above story may be giving you a sense of déjà vu.  If not, let me put things straight before you get into the story with fine tooth comb. After a season of mute administration and long battle cries of tolerant nation, ultimately the day came, when our own Noah- Narendra Modi took charge of our sinking nation. With bullish share market, deposits growing at healthy 14 percent, credit ratings upgrade and effective inflation management government has revived growth on trajectory of optimism.  As a result of these initiatives, India appears to be a half baked cake, where each global major is trying to add its own cheesy layer and devour the taste.

Both Japan and China are trying to curry favour with India in their own mannerism. Abe travelled all the way from Tokyo to Kyoto to personally welcome Modi. While Modi was drumming his way in a jam session with taiko drummers and wooed Japanese business community with red carpet not red tapism, Abe pledged to invest $35 billion of investment in India. Xi took Hindi-Chini bhai bhai bonhomie one step further by paying a visit to Narendra Modi’s home state Gujarat to taste the dum in gujju soil (pun intended) and after tasting the Khakra-Dhokla in Modinnerism served a platter of Chinese $100 billion investment in next five years. At the same time, instructing his PLA (People‘s liberation army) to pull all their might to win a regional war. We are still reading between the lines....But, more is yet to come with Modi’s impending visit to Uncle Sam. Let us see how many brownie points or coins, he picks up there. Now the question arises, Are these investments enough to swap India from its rugged road to its journey of becoming superpower or these investments will turn into Golden Goose which will stop giving results after some time? Let’s see.......

Norway is ranked as second wealthiest country in the world and enjoys the second highest GDP per capita. Its people are prosperous, happy and free. With their impeccable English and command over foreign languages they can shame much of Europe. In spite of not being a member of EU in 30 years from 1997 to 2001, GDP witnessed an increase of 177%; While Denmark which is a part of EU, UK saw an increase of 75% and 98% respectively. Many would suggest that Norway’s success can be attributed to it’s off shore oil industry (golden goose). It’s precisely true that oil and natural gas transformed Norway from one penniless nation to one of the most affluent countries. But it was only of rise of its educated labour class that created history. Norwegians themselves claim that only with education it became possible for them to harvest and utilise their resources in a better manner. They have strong revenue system, low unemployment, rising oil revenues, salary growth regularly and universal welfare services. Government focuses on rather flat income distribution with outlook of equality and ensures that every Norwegian has right to day care for their children, full coverage of pre-school age group, a common basic education from age of 6 to 16, tertiary education free of charge, a public system to give grants and loans to all students ensuring a proper education right to every citizen irrespective of their income. Even starting a business in not a task in Norway with minimum regulations and only five procedures to be undertaken. Human capital accumulation, not just capital accumulation and natural exploitation has rightly paid Norwegians in form of second most happy nation.

In Finland, another Nordic nation and one of world’s most successful country brags about its welfare state, low infant mortality rate, better school scores and far low poverty than even U.S. Finland‘s welfare system has extracted a well to do economic development strategy. Their schools are notoriously renowned for standardization and best practices in international arena. Schools have no standardization testing for students or South Asian “cramming” system. You won’t be able to see any teacher standing in classes and lecturing for 50 min rather students design their weekly targets. Also in addition to Finland’s excellent, efficient and equitable education system they have dirt cheap health care, social care allowance, and other enlightened policies which have been developed in years.


If you are thinking only European nations can sing in glory because western countries to aamir hoti hi hain, you are mistaken because our South Asian tiger is already roaring with efficiency in Malay Peninsula. Singapore- the alpha male of Asian tigers with population of 5.3 million is one of the most competitive markets and is in possession of 11th largest foreign reserves. Its roar is already sending shivers across strong nations like China and US. A nation under colonial influence till 1965 that left it ailing in destitution, which was not even sure of its future and was devoid of any natural resource, has written a history of being most promising economy. They have one of the best models for urban planning and bureaucratic efficiency by large statistics.  This has been possible because of their focus on Job creation that drives formation and expansion of middle class, quality housing, top notch public education making sure that even lower income people have access to quality education, innovative measures to challenges like immigration, taxation and debt. Government invests heavily in vocational, technical education and encourage a close interaction between education and industrial policies that is need of private sector. Also an open pro business economy and open door policy to foreign capital investment have made Singapore dark horse of developed countries. Even IMF named Singapore as easiest country to do business. Singapore Finance Minister Tharman quoted to a reporter “Singapore story can be explained by three factors: the cultural work ethic of Singaporeans, our response to adverse external conditions and our government especially its education and housing policies. Our approach is to enable people and support a culture of aspiration, work and personal responsibility, rather than have the government take over responsibility.”


Like we Indians invest in banks for our children’s wedded future, South Koreans invest in education. Everything from their social standing to marriage proposals are determined by their education standards. South Korean parent spend more on education than any other nation around 15% of GNP. Teaching in Korea is a high profile job and teachers are highly respected, highly paid, enjoy high social status and have great job security. South Korea which was once one of the poorest countries today is elite member of rich man’s club OECD. The success story of South Korea stands strong on edifice of its educational culture.

While other nations are delightfully tip-toeing with their education in tip-top condition towards amelioration, India’s present and future generation with their half-baked education fetched on basis of hard-earned cash find themselves in a total muddle. According to Pratnaman, an NGO In 2008 only 50% of class 3 student could read class 1 text, but by 2012 it declined by 30%. Even about 50% of class 3 kids were not able to recognize digits up to 100. The reason behind this decline has been years of neglect by government schools and related authorities. And thus, private sector is making huge inroads in education in rural India. As per UNESCO, India has lowest public expenditure on higher education per student, health and infrastructure. A country like Canada allocates 17.9% of budget on healthcare and 12.7% on education, Norway 17.9% of GDP on health care and 16.2% on education, Argentina 13.8% on education, South Korea 18.5% and India 3.4% of GDP on health care and 12.7% on education, quiet low as compared to other countries.

Successive Indian governments fail to realise that technology, scientific advances cannot be achieved by investment or FDI measures but brilliance, imagination and hard work of talented people. On one hand, countries that are emerging as leaders in scientific innovation are clearly those which focus on maximising potential of their citizens and retain the brightest minds & on the other hand, India is magnanimously herding its talented cash cows towards brain drain.

Natural capital which is considered to be wealth of any nation would become redundant in absence of human population to exploit it resourcefully. Thus, measures that aim at increasing human capital accumulation often gives a double dividend by equalizing income distribution, while at same time increasing growth. So, now we know why a kingdom not far away with its talented people, natural and mineral resources could not make golden goose lay egg & why that frantic man warned the king of golden goose? Why the new king was not better than the mute king? Because both were unable to ascertain that their golden goose is their population and they need to invest in them rather than dealing with foreign nations. Only an educated society can have well husbanded country side (infrastructure), enriched farm (agricultural production) and conditions (robust growth, increasing GDP, FDI) so favourable that even normal goose (citizens) can lay golden eggs (growth).


India cannot become superpower just by dealing with powerful nations. To push the power button, it needs to realize the need for balance between free competitive markets and welfare, and turn the utopian concept of welfare into reality. Let us start nurturing and nourishing the golden goose lyingstill in Indian population. If we fail to fathom importance of welfare system, day is not far  when acche din would become a metaphor, happiness a state of mind and India’s dream of becoming superpower would be beyond possibility as much as Modi’s suggestion to Soft drink manufacturers of blending fruit juice with their sweet frizzy drink. Hope Mr Narendra Modi is listening.


P.S. - Still story is not yet over................ you can get more from story.......!!!!  

Wednesday 17 September 2014

THE SARI AND PALLU EFFECT


“When television is good, nothing is better; when it’s bad, nothing is worse.”
                                                                 -Newton N. Minnow
                                               ……………………………………

Husband slaps his wife and the camera roles from, one character to another in order of their importance playing “let’s statue” for five minutes staring at each other and of course the slapped wife. And after the slap hangover everyone stands still while the mother and son throw the bahu out of house. ( Reason- varied and out of the reach of my mind for reference watch Sasural Simarka)

                                             ……………………………………

DIYA AUR BAATI HUM (TV Series)
Sooraj (mithai shop owner) – Sandhya (IPS officer and Sooraj’s wife) brought Rajkumar (antagonist) to Pushkar from Jaipur today.
(Whole family is stunned)
Bhabho (the disciplinarian saas)- Is this true Sandhya?? Why didn’t u tell us before?? (Angrily)
(Excuse me Bhabho… Sandhya was not aware that before taking orders from her seniors she needs to consult sassumaa…..of course glare on her like anything…afterall she is your bahu)
Sandhya -   …………………..( don’t take it wrong its speechless as usual)
Babasa (sasurji) - What was the need for Sandhya to get into this matter??

                                                …………………………………………..


Everyone may not be aware who Smriti Irani is, but everyone surely knows Sandhya Bahu or Bhabho. Any one sane can easily figure out a striking resemblance between the former puppet PM and Sandhya bahu who is shown to be as stunned and expressionless as much as Nargis Fakhri whenever someone lashes on her though she is an IPS officer. Similarly, is the case with all the Indian TV bahus like Simar (Sasural Simarka, Colors) who never simmers even when her husband marries another woman in front of her, Akshara (Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai) is a living goddess who is always correct and when the entire family was beggared she even turned into CEO who brought back everything with her strategic management skills, Gopi bahu (Sath Nibhana Saathiya) who behaves like a gong which can be stuck by vehement comments from any of the family members but will never ring or make any sound.

The Great Indian Soap operas have made a mare’s nest of Indian woman and their roles in society. The various saasbahu sagas, I would call them saasbahu  kahani because although the central theme would be child marriage or  a woman’s aspiration to be an IPS officer or female foeticide ultimately drama will metamorphose into protagonist getting married and story thereafter is onset. Mum-in-laws guided by these build a castle of expectations (altogether forgetting that saas bhi kabhi bahu thi) for their convent and college educated six figure earning bahus to be like soap opera daughter-in-laws who only grow up dreaming of getting married to their prince charming. Just like TV bahus, they should necessarily be docile, intelligent, wise, sugar coated superwoman, always clad in heavy saris with thick vermilion on their forehead and airbrush face. She should also be a master chef with varied culinary skills, Pablo Picasso in matter of art and craft and operate latest gadgets as well. As if that in not enough, she must be a self-sacrificing woman whose only aim is to make family happy and preserve sanskars. Also their bahurani should nothing be like television minx or vamps that pose with smart and confident look with trendy dresses or backless blouses, who are primarily busy plotting and aim to peel off layers of clothing along with every shred of happiness around them. But the entire self build substructure crumbles down when bahurani is not dumb and soft spoken instead she is vociferous, has mind of her own, aims and inspires to be successful in her career, loves to wear comfortable clothes like jeans, skirts and last blow comes when she is nowhere near being even an average homemaker.

Such an unassertive and backward portrayal of females reinforces gender stereotypes that date back to colonial influence. Who is to be blamed for such a dismal quality of television shows? Producers (who are mainly woman and lead a totally different lives than the characters on TV) or sentimental aamjanta which loves watching females weeping in consternation. TV producers and directors are selling sentiments and its working wonderfully for them while our minds are getting embedded into a perverted social attitude where female role is limited to doing household chores, doing dishes, washing clothes and raising families.


Television is a mirror to society and reflects the thinking and aspiration of its viewers. If such is the taste and outlook of our average Indian viewers, certainly it sounds bell of our intellectual regression. In India of 21st century females are emerging as challenge for men in every field; we are protesting against rapes, infanticides, dowry system; where women’s have started fighting for their rights; we clearly ignore the influence of television on more than 60 crore Indians of all age groups. It’s really shameful that such a strong powerful medium like TV presents such a distorted image of woman.  

Is television only responsible for entertainment- entertainment at cost of playing with sentiment? Isn’t media responsible towards woman who have no access to education or towards ‘ablanaris’ for whom husbands are bought at a price by rudimentary fathers?? Why not come up with real issues and against bizarre traditions? Shouldn’t it teach Indian mom-in-laws that your daughter in law may be different from them and they should accept them as they are? Can’t it be shown that woman can be more than a homemaker: a career oriented woman with dreams and aspiration. Shouldn’t it be revealed that sanskar and respect cannot be controlled by clothes, it lies in eyes? Altogether is that an arduous task? No, precisely not. In late 90’s Indian Television was host to various soap operas like Rajani, Tara, Shanti, Saans, Hasratein, Astitva-ek prem kahani  that challenged stereotype image of Indian Woman. These serial focused on women liberation and dared to talk about rape, extra marital relationship, divorce and remarriage.

Let’s hope our producers come up with more realistic television serials that portray a girl with a strong sense of individualism and aspires to be a career woman rather than sulking daughter-in-law. And more shows which will deal with real life issues, evil practises in our society and raise a toast to “mardaani” in every woman.....!!!!!!